Biomimetic Direct Composite Restoration of a Posterior Tooth with Extensive Structural Loss
Case Overview
The patient presented with a previously endodontically treated posterior tooth exhibiting extensive loss of coronal structure, marginal breakdown of the existing restoration, and compromised occlusal anatomy. Radiographic evaluation confirmed an adequately treated root canal system with no periapical pathology. The treatment objective was to restore function, seal, and biomechanical integrity using a direct biomimetic composite approach, avoiding unnecessary full-coverage restorations.
Diagnosis
- Structurally compromised posterior tooth
- Previous RCT with satisfactory obturation
- Defective coronal restoration with marginal leakage
- High functional demand area
Treatment Objectives
- Preserve remaining sound tooth structure
- Reinforce the tooth using biomimetic principles
- Achieve durable adhesion and marginal seal
- Restore natural occlusal morphology and contacts
- Distribute occlusal stresses physiologically
Step-by-Step Clinical Protocol
1. Pre-operative Assessment
- Clinical and radiographic examination confirmed restorability
- Occlusal analysis performed to identify functional cusps and load paths
- Decision made to proceed with a direct adhesive restoration rather than indirect cuspal coverage
Rationale:
Evidence supports adhesive restorations as a conservative alternative to crowns in endodontically treated teeth when sufficient enamel and dentin remain.
2. Isolation
- Absolute isolation achieved using a rubber dam
- Clamp selection ensured cervical seal without gingival trauma
Why this matters:
Rubber dam isolation is mandatory for predictable dentin bonding, moisture control, and long-term marginal stability.
3. Removal of Defective Restoration and Caries
- Old restorative material removed conservatively
- Caries excavation performed selectively, preserving affected but remineralizable dentin where indicated
Biomimetic concept:
Avoid over-excavation to reduce stress concentration and prevent weakening of the tooth.
4. Cavity Design and Stress Reduction
- Sharp internal line angles rounded
- No mechanical retention added
- Cavosurface margins kept enamel-based wherever possible
Rationale:
Rounded internal geometry reduces polymerization stress and crack initiation.
5. Adhesive Protocol
- Selective enamel etching using phosphoric acid
- Universal adhesive applied following active agitation
- Adequate solvent evaporation and light curing ensured
Key principle:
Strong enamel bonds + stress-absorbing dentin interface = long-term success.
6. Deep Margin Management (If Present)
- Deep cervical margins managed using deep margin elevation
- Flowable or highly filled composite used to relocate margins supragingivally
Benefit:
Improves isolation, bonding reliability, and marginal adaptation.
7. Incremental Composite Build-Up
- Dentin replacement achieved using a dentin-shade composite
- Incremental layering to limit C-factor
- Cuspal anatomy reconstructed following natural occlusal morphology
Why incremental layering:
Reduces polymerization shrinkage stress and mimics dentin elasticity.
8. Enamel Layering and Anatomy
- Enamel composite applied to recreate cusps, fissures, and marginal ridges
- Functional cusp anatomy respected
- Occlusal thickness controlled to prevent hyper-occlusion
9. Occlusal Adjustment
- Static and dynamic occlusion checked
- No heavy contacts on marginal ridges
- Functional contacts centered over sound tooth structure
Critical step:
Occlusion determines longevity more than material choice.
10. Finishing and Polishing
- Sequential finishing discs and rubber polishers used
- Surface texture preserved to mimic natural enamel
- Margins inspected under magnification
Outcome:
High gloss, plaque-resistant surface with seamless margins.
Final Outcome
- Tooth restored conservatively without full-coverage crown
- Excellent marginal adaptation and occlusal harmony
- Restoration blends naturally with adjacent dentition
- Patient retained maximum tooth structure with functional rehabilitation
Clinical Takeaway
This case highlights how biomimetic direct composite restorations can successfully replace traditional crowns in selected posterior teeth. When isolation, adhesion, stress management, and occlusion are respected, direct restorations can offer predictable, long-term outcomes with minimal biological cost.
References
- Magne P, Belser U. Adhesive restorations, centric relation, and the concept of biomimetics. J Esthet Restor Dent.
- Rocca GT, Krejci I. Cusp-covering direct composite restorations: a biomimetic approach. Quintessence Int.
- Van Meerbeek B et al. Adhesive dentistry: current concepts and future challenges. Oper Dent.
- Dietschi D, Spreafico R. Adhesive metal-free restorations: current concepts. Quintessence Publishing.
- Ferracane JL. Resin composite—state of the art. Dent Mater.
- Frankenberger R et al. Long-term clinical performance of bonded restorations. Oper Dent.
- Opdam NJ et al. Longevity of posterior composite restorations. J Dent Res.
Share on:
